As a product of the University of California – Go Aggies! – I will tell you from first hand that the UC demographic is all Asian. As it stands, having four- to five-times the amount of Asians represented in California’s premier school system isn’t necessarily a bad thing. But the breakdown is certainly telling in terms of where balance is needed. In a state funded education system where Asians make up only 12.4% of California’s population, Asians make up 40% of the university’s student body.
To address the imbalance, UC regents have decided to relax admission standards in order to expand the UC applicant pool.
As it stands, Fall 2008 admissions data from UC schools indicate the following breakdown:
University of California, Berkeley
- Asian-American: 46%
- White: 30.2%
- Latino: 11.5%
- African-American: 3.7%
University of California, Los Angeles
- Asian-American: 38%
- White: 34%
- Latino: 15%
- African-American: 3%
University of California, Davis
- Asian-American: 42%
- White: 36%
- Latino: 12%
- African-American: 3%
University of California, Irvine
- Asian-American: 51%
- White: 24%
- Latino: 12%
- African-American: 2%
University of California, Santa Barbara
- Asian-American: 19%
- White: 53%
- Latino: 19%
- African-American: 3%
Effective in 2012, UC Regents have changed the admissions requirements and process to drop the SAT subject test (SAT II) and to extend automatic admissions to the 91st percentile of California high school students.
Applicants are currently required to maintain a certain GPA and SAT composite score that combines SAT and SAT II scores in order to qualify for UC. The new requirements will lax the current standards. But UC estimates the new changes would qualify 1,800 more black, 7,500 more Latinos, 15,000 more whites, and 4,000 Asian-American students.
Although the test is aimed to increase UC’s applicant pool, Asian- and African-American students benefit the least. Especially since Asian-Americans perform better on the soon-to-be dropped SAT II subject test and other minority and white students perform better on the SAT (I) reasoning test, Asian American political pundits suggest the new requirements will greatly reduce the number of Asian Americans in UCs.
Further, the Asian-American community is most outraged in UC’s lack of outreach or consultation from the Asian community before instituting the changes.
I am a firm believer that admissions boards should admit individuals and not individuals from X-ethnic group. With that said, special attention does need to be paid to underrepresented minorities. While much of the Asian community suggest the requirement changes would lower the academic standards of the UC system, I believe any drop in academics are minimal as the increased diversity would outweigh any potential drop and will aid the melting-pot development of California youth.
Asians Good At Math, Followup
May 20th, 2009Following the Why Asians Are Good At Math post I wrote back in February, a few comments came up that I feel are necessary to clarify.
After reading Malcolm Gladwell’s position and possible explanation to the Asian-Americans are good at math phenomenon,
David had this to say:
While Mr. “Not_An_Asian” followed up with:
As David and company bring up valid arguments and points, the arguments rely on faulty logic.
The intricacies in a few Asian languages MAY present an advantage. With that said, an argument dictating that one characteristic may give a person an advantage fails to imply, without that advantage, that a same person will struggle.
For instance:
Being tall may give you an advantage at basketball. But not being tall doesn’t mean you will struggle, nor does it preclude you from other traits that would give you an advantage (i.e., speed, agility, endurance, etc…)
With that said, the theory attempts to explain why a larger percentage of Asian-Americans (and we know it’s a percentage since the SAT is scored in percentiles), succeed at math.
Language is a clearly identifiable trait you can associate to specific subsets of people and, to a degree, isolate as a factor that contributes to mathematical prowess.
And sure, there are plenty of mathematical genius’ around that are not Asian (Einstein, Stephen Hawking, Steve Nash, etc…). But we are not looking at the outliers, instead we are looking to explain why Asians as a group score higher in math than other groups.
I’m not saying the theory is true, for the pure fact that theories are unproven assertions, my contention is Malcolm Gladwell’s theory presents a new and refreshed theory to explain some American social phenomenon.
1 comment »
Posted in Asian Nuances, opinion
Tags: Comment Responses